logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2008.7.4.선고 2007가단47349 판결
사실상의소유권확인
Cases

207 Ghana 47349 de facto ownership verification

Plaintiff

****** 2*********)

Seoul Western-gu Hongdong* *

Attorney Lee Chang-tae, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Defendant

57****** 2***********)

Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu Mapyeongdong* *

Law Firm Whitek, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Attorney Lee Tae-tae, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 30, 2008

Imposition of Judgment

July 4, 2008

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim

It is confirmed that the Plaintiff has de facto ownership of the unauthorized building listed in the attached list.

Reasons

○ The Plaintiff asserts that, in relation to the payment of compensation, it is necessary to obtain confirmation that the Plaintiff acquired de facto ownership in relation to the payment of compensation, it is necessary to obtain the confirmation that the Plaintiff has de facto ownership in relation to the Defendant, since the Plaintiff acquired de facto ownership in relation to the payment of compensation, it is necessary to obtain confirmation that the Plaintiff has de facto ownership in relation to the management ledger of the unauthorized building, which is designated as a residential environment improvement improvement zone and registered as its owner on the ledger of the unauthorized Building Management of Unauthorized Building.

○ However, since the current law does not recognize rights or legal status as de facto ownership (see Supreme Court Decision 2006Da49000, Oct. 27, 2006). The instant lawsuit seeking the confirmation is unlawful (it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff has the right to receive compensation, even if the Plaintiff seeks confirmation that the right to receive compensation is the Plaintiff, the right to receive compensation should not be limited to cases where the Plaintiff actually acquired the right by mutual agreement between the parties, such as the use of unregistered and unauthorized buildings, profit, sale and gift, etc., but it cannot be extended even when the prescriptive acquisition has been completed).

○ The instant lawsuit is dismissed.

Judges

Judges Kim Jong-sung 1

arrow