logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(제주) 2020.06.10 2019나10943
이자 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status F of the party is the representative director of the Plaintiff, and E is the actual manager of the Plaintiff, and two couple were the above parties.

B. Around May 10, 2012, E, F, C, and D purchased KRW 341m2,00,000 from the purchase price on or before the annexation. ② The Plaintiff, C, and D purchased KRW 2083m2,00,000 in the purchase price of KRW 441,00,00,000 prior to the annexation. ③ E, F, C, and D purchased the land indicated in paragraph (2) of the attached Table on July 5, 2012 in the purchase price of KRW 475,50,00,000,000 in total, and KRW 30,000,000 in the purchase price of KRW 30,000,000,000 in Q2,000,000,000 in the purchase price of KRW 341m2,241,241,00 in each of the instant forest and forest land after the annexation of KRW 37,083.

3) The Plaintiff owned 1/2 shares of the instant land, and C and D owned 1/4 shares of each of the instant land, and C, D, E, and F owned 1/4 shares of each of the instant land No. 2. The Defendant purchased each of the instant land No. 1 from the Plaintiff, C, and D on December 26, 2012 and purchased each of the instant land No. 3, D, E, and F on the same day from C, D, and F (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant sales contracts”).

(4) On the same day, the Defendant paid approximately KRW 650 million to C and D as the purchase price of each of the instant sales contracts, and paid KRW 45 million to the Plaintiff, F and E. KRW 45 million.

C. The Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant M Co., Ltd., carried out the business of building and selling condominiums on each of the instant land (hereinafter “instant business”), and M for the instant business.

arrow