beta
Text
Defendant
A In 10 months of imprisonment, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment of 1 year and 4 months, and Defendant D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On December 13, 2018, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and eight months for fraud, etc. in the Suwon District Court Ansan branch on December 13, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 26, 2019.
Defendant
D On October 30, 2018, the Suwon District Court sentenced 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for special injury, etc., which became final and conclusive on March 26, 2019.
【Criminal Facts】
The Defendants conspired with F, G, and H (Suspension of Prosecution) in sequence, and agreed to claim and instruct the whole crime, such as: (a) the role of Defendant C and Defendant D to claim and instruct the whole crime; (b) the role of Defendant A as a middle and high-speed dr and vehicle owner; (c) the role of Defendant E in recruiting loan holders; (d) the role of Defendant E in recruiting loan holders; (c) the role of F, H, H, and Defendant B in recruiting loan holders; and (d) the fact is that F, G, H, and Defendant B do not think that they actually purchase and use high-speed vehicles; and (e) although there is no intention or ability to pay for the loan, they applied for the loan of the second and second purchase price although they do not have an intention or ability to pay for the loan; and (e) the vehicle purchased is decided to acquire the loan by acquiring the loan by means of the transfer of ownership under the name of Defendant A after the transfer of ownership.
Accordingly, Defendant D and C sent text messages to the effect that, around September 12, 2018, Defendant D and C had to undergo an investigation by mistake with Defendant C, in light of the relationship between Defendant E and Defendant D and Defendant D and C, at the time of examination of the witness, Defendant E sent text messages to the effect that, at the time of examination of the witness, Defendant E sent text messages to the effect that “I would be a customer from Defendant D,” and that “I would be a customer from Defendant D,” and that, at the time of examination of the witness, Defendant C would be an investigative agency.