logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.08.09 2016고단918
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five years and for eight months, respectively.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[The record of the crime against Defendant A] On November 20, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of one year on June 9, 2016, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for fraud.

[Criminal facts]

1. "2016 Highest 918" against Defendant A;

A. The Defendant, who forged a private document or carried out the said investigation document, attempted to use the sale contract in the name of L Co., Ltd. (trustee and trustee), M Co., Ltd. (Co.), N Co. (Co., Ltd.), N Co. (Co., Ltd.), and N Co. (Co., Ltd.) by forging the sale contract in the name of the J to exercise the right of use.

The Defendant was in his office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentO on October 13, 2014, and was in his office.

After indicating that the above officetel 1006 is sold to P (J's) in the form of the K supply contract in KRW 236,445,890, the name and resident registration number of P are stated in the buyer's column, and the defendant was placed in advance by the name of L corporation in the seller's column entered in the same letter.

The defendant had the seal of the representative director of L corporation, and the name next to the name of M corporation

M. The defendant had the seal of the representative director of M. corporation, and the name and next name of N.

The NN representative director's seal was affixed, and the sales contract was signed and delivered to J without knowledge that it was forged.

On October 24, 2014, the Defendant forged a contract for the sale of an officetel 1004 with the same method, issued it to the J, and forged the said officetel 1013 with the same method and issued it to the J on February 25, 2015.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged three copies of the sales contract in the name of L Co., Ltd., M Co., Ltd., and N Co., Ltd., and exercised it by delivering it to J who may know that it was forged.

(b).

arrow