logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.11 2015고단503
사기등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, from July 2010 to July 1, 2010, is a person operating liquor wholesale business in the name of “stock company G” from Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the trade name of “stock company G” to the extent that there is no risk of actual disadvantage to the Defendants’ exercise of their defense rights, and Defendant B and C are in line with the school line.

Defendant

A In the lawsuit brought by the creditor H against G on March 10, 201, the Seoul High Court rendered a favorable judgment with the purport that “The above G shall pay the H a loan of KRW 167,822,456 and any damages for delay thereof”, and the creditor I knew that he/she had a claim of KRW 250 million against G on September 18, 2008, and that he/she started the compulsory auction procedure for corporeal movables in the company’s liquor on April 201, 201, he/she concluded a false monetary loan contract with the Defendant B and C, and used it to interfere with the creditor’s claims collection.

1. On June 30, 201, the Defendants’ false entry in the authentic copy of the authentic deed by the Defendants in the office of the law firm office of the second floor in the Nam-gu Incheon Nam-gu J building, and the fact that the Defendants, B, and C did not have a claim and debt relationship between the Defendants, B, and C, the attorneys-at-law in charge of notarial services shall lend KRW 350 million to G on June 27, 201, respectively, on July 5, 2011.

“The” made a notarial deed of a monetary loan for consumption with the content thereof.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to enter false facts in the No. 93 and No. 94 of the said law office, which is the original copy of the notarial deed, in the notarial deed, respectively.

2. Defendant A’s evasion of compulsory execution was at the risk of being forced by H and I as above, and on June 30, 201, Defendant A was exempt from compulsory execution by having the office of the second floor K law firm of the Incheon Southern-gu J building prepare a notarial deed of a monetary loan agreement with the operation of Defendant G as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, with the content that Defendant B and C bears false debts.

arrow