beta
Text
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.
At the time of the accident, at around 20:55 on April 5, 2019, the insured vehicle CD of the Plaintiff insured vehicle at the time of the accident, and at around 20:20:55 on April 5, 2019, the part of the left-hand side of the E-vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) where the Plaintiff’s vehicle moving into the two-lane in the situation of the collision of the damaged vehicle in the Busan East-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (hereinafter referred to as “the damaged vehicle”) was changed to the one-lane, the Plaintiff vehicle’s left-hand side of the vehicle was avoided to the left-hand side, and then returned to the original vehicle, and then the two-lane side part of the vehicle was paid to the right-hand side of the Plaintiff vehicle (i.e., hospital and agreement amount 2, 2,2500
2. Determination
A. The plaintiff asserts that the accident in this case is an accident where the plaintiff's vehicle is forced to overtake the non-motor vehicle within the intersection where the change of the lane is prohibited, without manipulating direction direction, etc., and the driver's vehicle is forced to pay 5,851,760 won out of the insurance proceeds paid by the plaintiff and delay damages for the accident where the plaintiff's vehicle is faced with the driver's vehicle toward hand in order to avoid collision.
The defendant is merely a change of the lane to avoid a collision with the teteteme vehicle that the defendant's vehicle entered into the lane, and the accident of this case is an accident that the plaintiff's vehicle gets into the left side and gets into the right side again in the course of excessively regulating the movement of the defendant's vehicle prior to the plaintiff's vehicle and returning the vehicle to the right side. Therefore, there is no negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle.