logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.08.07 2013고정997
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:30 on April 5, 2013, the Defendant discovered that the back number plate of the GTX 3 police box belonging to the GTX 267 TTX 267, which patroled the Defendant’s E-si, was protruding, and reported to be taken by using a camera held to secure the Defendant’s violation of the Automobile Management Act and the evidence for illegal parking, and thereby interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the investigation and traffic control by assaulting D’s chest at large interest and at one time with the shoulder and the right face of the above D’s chest at hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness D's legal statement and each statement of witness D and F in the third and fifth five trial records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written confirmation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant intentionally carried a registration license plate on April 5, 2013, even if he was unable to cover or make it illegible, the Defendant intentionally put the back number plate of the above taxi in a manner of covering the back number plate of the above taxi in order to avoid parking regulation while parking the taxi owned by the Defendant, in front of the 267 luminous KTX 3 in a light-time flashing line.

2. The Defendant asserted that another person only laid his/her taxi number plate and that he/she did not run the taxi number plate. Even if based on the statement of D or F at the time, the Defendant did not confirm whether the Defendant was directly involved in the conduct of leaving the taxi number plate, and even after completion of other duties, he/she observed that the Defendant’s taxi number plate is difficult.

arrow