beta
Text
Defendant
A, B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
I and J have overall control over the business as an operator of K in the Gyeonggi-si (State) and (State) NN in the Gyeonggi-si, and have many and unspecified investors manage the investment money through the investment presentation of the said company. Defendant D and Defendant A are listed as the representative director of the said company and promised to receive profits from I and J. Defendant B are the head of the computer office in charge of receiving investment money from investors to April 2015, and Defendant C is the head of the computer office in charge of paying dividends from investors during the period from January 2015 to May 2015. Defendant C is a person who performs a factory management and computer work from May 2015 to May 2015.
Defendant
A, Defendant B, and Defendant C, together with I, J on January 2015, hold an investment explanation meeting with respect to investors recruited by the said solicitation books at the Office of the Public Relations Center of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City (State) (P) on the second floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City P, thereby making an investment of 20 pro ratas if they make an investment in the (state) L-based factory automation facilities.
“The purpose was to acquire money under the pretext of investment by deceiving money.”
1. Defendants A, B, and C committed fraud are operating a L-based tax factory at the above (ju) L office around February 28, 2015 with I, J, and the victim Q Q.
If an automation facility is installed, the amount of production can be increased further, and 20% of the amount of investment will be paid as dividends with profits generated by making an investment in the facility (payment of KRW 30,000 to KRW 40,000,000), and 18% of the amount of investment will be paid as a recruitment allowance if it is for investors.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, even if the Defendants received an investment from the injured party, they did not have the intent or ability to produce, sell, and the business method of the said company did not have the intent or ability to make an investment in (state) LL factory automation facilities.