The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and speaks against the defendant, the fact that the criminal defendant has been punished several times by including the punishment for fraud, the defendant has repeatedly committed the crime of fraud in this case from the time when the execution of the punishment (including detention in the prison) sentenced to fraud, etc. was completed and the damage recovery was not performed, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records, such as the motive and background leading up to each of the crimes in this case, the situation after the crime, the defendant's age, health, character, and environment, are considered as being too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, pursuant to Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below shall be corrected by correcting " May 25, 2014" in the first and fifth column to " March 6, 2014."