(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.12.24 2013고단2690

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.12.24 2013고단2690

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving a DNA Tracck trucks.

At around 16:00 on August 16, 2013, the Defendant operated the above truck and proceeded with three lines of Madod International National Highway, which are in the Triang-dong of Yangju City, from the Do Government.

At that time, as a road leading to the city, the vehicle traffic volume is frequent, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to live well before and after the passage and the left and to safely proceed with the vehicle line while keeping the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not look well at the front part of the instant truck over a one-lane and two-lane, and due to the negligence of the Defendant’s driving the said truck over a two-lane, the Defendant received the front part of the said truck from the victim E (the 52-year old) to the right side of the said truck, and caused the said straw to go beyond the median line, and caused the said straw to go beyond the median line, and caused the said straw to the above 25t truck driving by the victim G (the 44-year old truck) to go ahead of the opposite direction, and caused the said Hashe to take part adjacent to the right side of the said straw or other straw truck, thereby causing the 2nd parallel in need of long-term medical treatment, and at the same time, causing the said G to suffer salt in need of light care for about two weeks, and making it impossible for the said 84th th th th th son to repair or destroy the said vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered an injury to another person due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures even after destroying property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the defendant's prosecution;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Each letter of diagnosis;

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 해남지원 2013.08.14 2013고단114

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.08.21 2013고단627

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.13 2014고단10092

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.07 2015고단4235

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.04.30 2014고단359