logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.08 2016고단6284
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

[The guilty part] The defendant who committed the crime committed by the defendant is guilty

5. From around June of the year of Suwon-si, the managing director of the management office of the main apartment D in Suwon-si is a person in charge of the maintenance and repair of common areas of multi-family housing, collection of management expenses, vicarious payment of public charges, etc., collection, accumulation, and management of long-term repair allowances, execution of matters resolved by the resident representative meeting.

1. The Defendant uses the long-term repair appropriation account for any purpose other than its original purpose, and uses it for the purpose other than its original purpose, is a person who collects the long-term repair appropriation fund from the victims who are the owners of the above Dwork's name and incompetence, and accumulates it as a long-term

On December 28, 2011, the Defendant terminated the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) account under the name of the management office of the said D on deposit of KRW 12,758,577, following the termination of the long-term repair reserve of the said D D D on December 28, 201, and embezzled the long-term repair reserve using the said D D’s payment of wages to employees belonging to the management office of other D on September 27, 2012 while the Defendant deposited KRW 12,758,577 to the foreign exchange bank account under the name of the management office of the said D D’s general management expenses.

On April 30, 2013, the Defendant terminated the Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) account in the name of the management office due to the accumulation of the long-term repair reserve of the said Dwork, and embezzled the long-term repair reserve using KRW 17,000,000 as the construction cost of the Dwork’s LE signboard repair for any purpose other than its original purpose.

As a result, the Defendant embezzled the total amount of KRW 29,758,577 on two occasions while keeping the long-term credit reserve funds owned by the victims in business.

2. After setting aside the long-term repair allowances, the Defendant is a person who collects and keeps the long-term repair allowances from the victims, who are owners of the above Dwork's name and incompetence.

On August 2012, the Defendant collected from the victims of the disaster on August 2012, 2012.

arrow