logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.06.13 2016고정474
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 2008 to December 31, 2010, the Defendant was actually operating “D” on the fourth floor of the building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant, at the time, had the above incorporated association’s representative was called “E” and had the Defendant, F, and G applied for a new employment promotion incentive to the Seoul Regional Labor Agency, and had the intent to receive the incentives denied.

around October 208, the Defendant applied for a new employment promotion subsidy of KRW 600,000,000 for a total of five times, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes, for a subsidy of KRW 2,700,000,000 for a group of five times in total, for a group of five times as shown in the attached Table of Crimes, at the victim’s employment center office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Employment Service (Seoul Metropolitan Government Employment Center) located in 120 as a line of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On November 1, 2009, the Defendant applied for the same incentive to F, who is the actual operator of the said incorporated association, and is unable to apply for new employment promotion incentives due to the fourth degree of relationship between the Defendant and the actual operator of the said incorporated association, and was paid KRW 4.5 million on November 17, 2009.

Around November 2010, the Defendant applied for the same incentive to the Defendant himself/herself, who is unable to apply for the new employment promotion incentive as the actual operator of the said incorporated association, at the office of the same victim, and was paid KRW 2.7 million on November 15, 2010.

As a result, the defendant deceivings the victim and received a subsidy of 9.9 million won to promote new employment from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Each police statement made to H, E, I, and J;

1. Each letter of answer by G and F;

1. A written accusation;

1. Reporting (labor, branch office, certificate (D), inquiry into persons eligible for subsidies by workplace, and inquiry into the results of unfair receipt of subsidies for employment security, in 208;

arrow