A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (such as a driver’s assault, etc.) was under the influence of alcohol in the vicinity of the national highway 25 that was in the old and Seosi-si Seap (25 years old) and was driving by the victim B (50 years old) on the back seat of the national highway 10:0:25 on August 25, 2017, the Defendant would want to fight against the victim without any justifiable reason.

I would like to die.

“Along with the sound of “Astrosta” and assaulted by following the victim’s neck, hump, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. On August 25, 2017, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) destroyed 275,000 won in total of the repair cost, by putting the cab in front of the police box, putting the cab in front of the police box, putting the cab in front of the police box, putting the cab in front of the police box, and putting the cab in front of the police box, putting in front of the police box, and putting in front of the police box, and putting in front of the police box the cabphone, telephone gate, telephone gate, and device installed at the entrance of the police box.

In addition, the Defendant, at around 00:47 of the same day, continued to walk and walk the station door of the police box on the same day, was obstructed by the F, a police officer belonging to the above police box, who discovered it, by putting the F abundance, putting the f abundance, booming it on the f, and taking the bundance, etc., and carried the bridge to the side of the roadway before the police box.

The F caused the knee and knenebbbucks to be knee and knickbucks, and assaulted F's hand to defend the face by walking up three times.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the utility of things used by public offices, and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes, protection of people's body, public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to B and F 1.