1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

(a) 1,691 and C 407 E, each of which has a domicile in the Gyeonggi Yang-gun Group B, was assessed against E, respectively.

B. From the preceding B, each land listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land 1”; and land listed in Paragraph 3 of the attached Table 3 (hereinafter referred to as “third land”), etc. in C in the attached Table 1 List 1, 2, and 3 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”), respectively. The registration of preservation of ownership in the Defendant’s name has been completed for each land listed in the attached Table 2, as shown in the attached Table 2.

C. The father of the Plaintiff’s assistance team F (F, permanent domicile: Gyeonggi Yang-gun G), namely, the Korean and Chinese name of the Plaintiff’s assistance team, is H as the above person under whose name the name is the same.

On the other hand, the above D Ri and I, which are the domicile of the situation-based E, were all incorporated into the Nam-ju City due to the reorganization of the administrative district, which is the legal domicile of the plaintiff Cho Jong, and at the present, the register of expulsion of J is not kept.

[Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute; Results of fact-finding on South-North Korea case]

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that E, a person in charge of the circumstances in the above B and C, and his increased H, are the same persons, and that the Plaintiff is the inheritor of each of the lands of this case divided from each of the above lands, and the Plaintiff seeks to cancel registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the Defendant, on the premise that the Plaintiff is the inheritor of each

B. (1) In the land survey project conducted under the Decree on Land Survey during the Japanese Occupation Period, a person who is assessed as a landowner shall acquire the ownership of the land in question from an original and creative perspective.

However, in light of the probability that there have been a lot of causes to change the transaction of land and other legal relations for a long time from the land situation to the year of 100, and other significant social and economic changes or the trend of use of land, it shall be deemed as a successor of the person under the circumstance, by inheritance.