A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from January 2015 to March 2015, operated “EM” in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and the same year from July 2015.

8. From August 7, 2015 to the end of the same month, a person operating “G Mart” in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon to the end of the same month.

The Defendant acquired marina and paid only a part of the fee for the acquisition of marina in a normal way without the intention and ability to operate the marina in a normal way with the goods, and operated the marina for a short time as above, the Defendant attempted to acquire the goods from credit from the distributors, such as logistics, and then dispose of the goods or to acquire the money by transferring the goods to a third party with the marina and the goods together.

1. On January 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered into an oral agreement with the employees of the victim company to engage in the transaction of goods supply under the aforesaid “E E E E”; and (b) entered into with the JJ on the part of the employees of the victim company

2. 5. In preparing a contract for goods supply as a person, the injured company shall pay the price in cash at the same time as the goods are supplied by the injured company, and even if a credit transaction is made in cash, 70% of the credit price shall be settled every 28th day of the month and 100% of the credit price shall be settled every 28th day of the same year.

A false statement was made.

However, in the course of operating Maart, the Defendant had a number of transaction partners’ unpaid amount including the amount equivalent to 35,000,000 won for goods which was not paid due to tasks, neglect tasks, etc., while operating Maart, and on January 12, 2015, the Defendant decided to take over 300,000,000 won “EM” from K, but did not have the ability to pay the acquisition price within the due date. Therefore, even if the Defendant received goods from the victim company, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price by operating Maart.

The defendant deceivings the victim company as above, and his deceivings the victim company from February 4, 2015 to the same year.

3. The person received the delivery of household goods in an amount equivalent to 31,968,380 won by up to September 19;

2. The delivery of a check by the party;