logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.07 2017나2016080
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case are as follows. The reasons for citing the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: from 5th to 3th of the judgment, the term “the defendant’s assertion” to 5th of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except as stated in 2th of the following 2. As to the defendant’s assertion of ratification, the part concerning 2th of the judgment is as follows: (i) as to the defendant’s assertion of ratification, i.e., the declaration of intention of recognition of execution on notarial deed was an act of litigation by a document prepared by the joint law office or notary public in accordance with the sexual rule as the debtor’s sole declaration of intention to the joint law office or notary public; (ii) the declaration of ratification on notarial deed as to 5th of the judgment of the court of first instance should be made by the notary public of the court of second instance, and there is no lack of evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff’s 20.

arrow