The imprisonment with prison labor for the accused shall be determined by one year and two months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of three years for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) at the Suwon method Board, and had the same record of 13 times.

"2016 Highest 2289"

1. Habitual theft;

A. The Defendant, at around 12:36 September 3, 2016, inside the office of “E” for the operation of the victim D in Asia-si, Asan-si, in total of one million won for cash and checks in the book, agricultural cooperative CC card 1, modern card 1, etc.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

B. On October 3, 2016, around 18:00, the Defendant: (a) stolen a wall with a cash of 30,000 won owned by the victim G in the room room at the 208 heading room; and (b) transportation cards.

(c)

On October 28, 2016, the Defendant 115,000 won in cash owned by the victim I located at the “J coffee shop” operated by the victim I in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si on October 28, 2016, in cash belonging to the victim, which is located on the Kabter’s chair, and on the wall containing one hundred five thousand won in cash, one bank bC card, one foreign bank bC card, one copy in the foreign exchange bank, etc.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

(d)

On September 29, 2015, the Defendant cut off the wall with a 1.1 million won in cash belonging to the victim, located on a computer at the victim L's residence, 1 K 302, Dong-dong 302, at Ansan-si.

E. On September 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) taken out KRW 250,000 in cash owned by the victim and located within a small credit cooperative located therein at the O gas station office located in Young-gu, Young-si, Young-si; (b) around 21:58,000.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

As a result, the Defendant habitually stated the five-time indictments as “three times” but this was a theft of another person’s property through a clerical error in the five-time indictments.

2. On September 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received and used one cell phone set in the name of the victim from the Three Deputy Director of R “R” operated by the victim Q Q in P on a broad-scale basis on the condition that he/she works as an employee; and (b) on September 30, 2016, the Defendant used one cell phone set in the victim’s name on a cell phone with the amount of 600,000