logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.07.22 2020고단3487
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Seoul Central District Court to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the same court on March 27, 2018.

피고인은 2020. 2. 10. 23:42경 서울 영등포구 여의하류 부근 올림픽대로부터 인천 계양구 B 앞 도로까지 약 20km 구간에서 술을 마신 상태로 C 카니발 자동차를 운전하던 중, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 인천계양경찰서 경비교통과 소속 경찰공무원으로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 심하게 나고 눈이 빨갛게 충혈 되고 혀가 꼬여 발음이 부정확한 등 피고인이 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할만한 상당한 이유가 있어 2020. 2. 11. 00:13경 호흡에 의한 음주측정을 요구받았다.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not comply with the blood alcohol measurement by explicitly disclosing his/her intention of refusal without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement of an employee;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiries, such as criminal records, etc., investigation reports (such as the same type of power, etc.), and Acts and subordinate statutes regarding summary orders;

1. Relevant statutory provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1), 44 (2), and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (to select a fine in consideration of the circumstances not having the same criminal records, etc., in addition to the summary order twice in 2014-2018, which shall be taken into account in calculating the amount of fine, in addition to the summary order of the same criminal records, on condition that the defendant shall take into account the patterns of the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow