logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2021.01.15 2019나16162
추심금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked and this shall apply.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. In addition to KRW 2,658,765,382, the judgment of the first instance court, which recognized deduction from the purchase price of this case, the sum of KRW 135,374,746, which the Defendant spent, should be additionally deducted from the purchase price of this case.

The amount of 10,00,000 won paid to cancel the mortgage of 1 N (the unit: 10,000 won) the amount of 15,735,000 personnel expenses for 3 R 2 childcare teachers, the amount of 10,000,000 consulting fees for 12,000,000,000 for subrogated provisional seizure against 4 children's house 12,000,000,000 for 35,000,000 for food material expenses for 6 5,000,000 for 30,000,000,000 for 12,9,746,000,0000 for 30,000,000 for 30,000,000 for 30,000,000 for 30,0000 won for 30,01,0000

B. The judgment of the first instance court, which recognized the deduction from the purchase price of this case, totaling KRW 411,05,968, supra, cannot be deducted from the purchase price of this case.

The amount of money (unit: 240,00,000,000 personal debt C assumed pursuant to the mutual agreement on June 19, 2017, and other settled amounts of 100,000,000,000 pursuant to the mutual agreement on July 17, 2017, and the amount of the water and electricity charges (21,000,000) paid on August 31, 2017, 202 2,854,940 principal and interest of loans (2) (2,854,940 interest and interest of 8,9,26 through 31, 36, 38), 68,201,028 / [Attachment 2] the Plaintiff’s non-mutual claim

2. Determination:

A. As to the Defendant’s assertion of mutual aid, the Defendant consistently stated that KRW 10,000,000,000, which was paid in relation to the 1st time collateral in the table 1,000 (in the first instance trial, the Defendant’s above KRW 10,000,00 was the expenses for cancellation separate from the secured debt. However, in the first instance trial, the Defendant was the secured debt newly acquired by the Defendant.

arrow