logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.08.23 2018고정660
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who gets on a taxi with a victim C (51 tax, South) who gets on a taxi as a guest.

A. Around 06:00 on October 2, 2018, the Defendant damaged property, on the ground that he was aboard a Echier HG private taxi operated by the injured party in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, and in front of the street, and the victim was not aware of the destination accurately. The Defendant damaged the property that requires approximately KRW 377,848 of repair costs, such as getting off the taxi by getting off the taxi and walking the back of the taxi at one time, thereby causing defects in the car.

B. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same time and place as the above A. A. The Defendant committed assault by taking the victim’s face side one time each on the ground that the Defendant was driving away from the Defendant to resist the destroyed taxi problem and was not subject to the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation, and that it was not subject to the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (the date of the second public trial shall be the date);

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Investigation report (2) Attachment of a suspect's taxi photograph);

1. A criminal investigation report (on-site inspection and confirmation);

1. Report of investigation (2) Confirmation of suspect taxi stuffs and video images);

1. Investigation report (on-site holding office and confirmation);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow