A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] The defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seog-gu District Court's branch on September 28, 2007 and three times all the records of criminal punishment for a violation of Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle with B A-Wurd-

On January 1, 2019, at around 06:10, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.128% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.128% and led D to drive the front road along the two-lanes in the direction of the merchant south four-lane from the direction of the merchant south four-lane.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to care in keeping the safety distance of the motor vehicle as well as to drive the motor vehicle in good condition.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant did not observe the safety distance while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.128%, the Defendant is running ahead of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle with the driver’s error in the course of business that drives the foregoing vehicle prior to the same line.

The victim E (the 53-year old) who stopped for the signal atmosphere was a driver after the driver was driven by the F. E., and the victim was suffering from the f.o.b. c. c. c. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

2. Around 06:10 on January 1, 2019, the Defendant driven a vehicle of hurburged B with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.128% from the G apartment in the front of the Daegu-gu G apartment on the road of the same month and from about 1 Km section to the front of the D road, while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.128%.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the regulations on prohibition of drinking driving at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A traffic accident;