Text
Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Defendant A is a person operating a restaurant in the name of “D” on the first floor of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan building, Seongbuk-gu, and Defendant B is a person working for the restaurant as an employee.
가. 피고인 A 피고인은 2020. 8. 21. 22:30 경 위 ‘D' 음식점에서, 피해자 B와 고용 계약서 반환 문제로 시비가 되어 말다툼하다가 피해자에게 “ 씨 발 새끼야, 걍 꺼져” 라는 등의 욕설을 하며 손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 밀치고, 계속하여 같은 날 23:30 경 위 음식점에 다시 찾아온 피해자와 고용 계약서 문제로 다시 말다툼하다가 피해자에게 “ 씨 발 새끼야, 병신새끼야” 라는 등의 욕설을 하며 손으로 피해자의 목을 잡고 밀치는 등 폭행하였다.
B. On August 21, 2020, Defendant B, at around 23:30 on August 21, 2020, committed assault against the victim, such as taking the victim’s neck, threatening the victim to take the victim’s neck by drinking, and threatening the victim’s drinking.
2. The facts charged against the Defendants are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the records and arguments, it can be acknowledged that the Defendants expressed their intent not to be punished by the counter-party by mutual consent around October 7, 2020, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.