logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.10.29 2019고정599
업무방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date the judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants jointly committed a crime (Interference with their duties) and interfere with the Victim’s Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Duties by force by force by preventing a transaction with customers by doing so by doing so, in the case where there are two customers of the Victim H in Seongbuk-gu E building in Sungnam-si and the F G office around December 27, 2018. The mother would not be able to engage in funeral services. The mother has changed to a duct. The mother has received money from a ducted year. The son of the fraud changed to a duct. The son of the said ducted duct, which means where the ducted duct, would be the duct, and thereby preventing the transaction with customers

2. At the same time and place as above 1.3, Defendant A’s defamation infringed the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact by openly pointing out the fact, “The victim’s reputation is proved to be a false person upon whom she had a 14 member of the victim’s H, and by openly pointing out the fact that she had a her entire fraud from 14 members of the victim’s H, and that she had a her escape as if she had been engaged in murdering, such as her singish singing, and that she was in a disguised manner, such as her singish.”

3. Defendant C’s defamation infringed the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out a fact by assaulting a large amount of 6 months with two customers of the victim H in the same place and place as the above 1.1.

4. Defendant D’s defamation caused damage to the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out a fact by openly pointing out the fact by assaulting a large amount of interest on the part of the two customers of the victim H in the same place and place as the above 1.3.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A, C, and D: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow