logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.09.26 2013노340
공갈등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal by the defendant;

A. There is no fact that the Defendant had solicited the F, a juvenile, to sell sex.

B. The sentence of the lower judgment on unreasonable sentencing (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and probation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. According to the records on the assertion of mistake of facts in the original trial on December 7, 2012, M: (a) although the facts at the court of the original trial on December 7, 2012, by the Defendant that F would drink, the Defendant reported that F would have been subject to sexual harassment by the Defendant, as F, while in the name of the Defendant, as F, and that he was unable to hear the horses to attract F to engage in sexual traffic (see, e.g., trial record 94 pages); (b) contrary to the first testimony at the court of the original trial on November 6, 2012, M would be deemed as having “the Defendant’s testimony at the court of the original trial, including F’s hand, and F’s external and F. It would be deemed that F would have no effect on F’s testimony at the court of first time, and thus, it would be deemed that, in light of the circumstances that F would have been able to take the Defendant’s family member’s testimony at the court, it would have no knowledge that F would have been a witness’s testimony.

arrow