logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.13 2016재나78
손해배상(기)
Text

All applications for retrial and quasi-deliberation of this case shall be dismissed.

Costs of appeal for retrial and quasi-adjudication shall be assessed.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the petition for quasi-deliberation of this case

A. Plaintiff’s assertion 1) On June 23, 2015, Suwon District Court 2015 or 19, the part of the order to dismiss the petition of appeal was dismissed on June 23, 2015, and the appellate court rendered an order of rejection of the petition of appeal 20.1 on June 10, 2015 to pay the service fees and stamp fees for the order of correction issued on June 20, 2015. However, the above order of quasi-deliberation 201.20 of Suwon District Court 201.20 of the above order of dismissal on June 20, 2015, the court rejected the petition of appeal 201.20 of the above order of dismissal on June 24, 2015 (the above order of dismissal 201.2 of the court below’s motion of rejection on June 7, 2014).

There is a ground for quasi-deliberation which corresponds to “when a judgment on important matters that may affect the judgment is omitted” under Article 451(1)9 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. On June 23, 2015, Suwon District Court Decision 2015Na19, the part of the order to dismiss the petition of appeal issued on June 23, 2015, and Articles 425 and 399 of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow