beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
On April 3, 1997, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 30, 1992 with respect to 1/18 shares out of 413.9 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). On March 13, 1998, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer for E-owned 1/18 shares out of the instant land, due to sale on February 10, 1998. On June 24, 1998, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Plaintiff as to the instant land and Article 304 (hereinafter “instant section for exclusive use”).
Since then, 2/18 shares among the land in this case owned by the plaintiff and the section for exclusive use in this case were decided on February 3, 200 by compulsory commencement decision (Seoul District Court's government support H). At that auction procedure, I completed the registration of ownership transfer due to compulsory auction on May 30, 202.
I, around October 21, 2003, concluded a contract to establish a right to lease on a deposit basis with Goyang-si to establish a right to lease on a deposit basis, and completed the registration of establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis with Goyang-si. On January 9, 2009, on 1/18 of the land in this case, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of sale on January 8, 2009 with respect to 1/18 of the land in this case. On April 16, 2009, Goyang-si applied for a voluntary auction on the part in this case based on the right to lease on a deposit basis and rendered a decision of voluntary commencement of auction on April 16, 2009. The Defendants completed the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to 1/2 of each share due to the sale by voluntary auction on December 29, 2009.
After the completion of the building of this case, the Plaintiff purchased Nos. 201 and 203 on June 24, 1998, and the Plaintiff, which was the general partner of the Plaintiff, renounced the ownership of this case to be sold in lots, and was the only part of exclusive ownership of this case at the time.