The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,00,00, and a fine of KRW 300,000, respectively, for the crime No. 2 of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the person in charge of accounting of the D candidate, who was going to the election district of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Council members on June 4, 2014.

1. Persons in charge of accounting in violation of the Public Official Election Act, etc. shall not disburse election expenses in excess of 1/200 of the restricted amount of election expenses publicly announced by the Jeju Election Commission, and the restricted amount of election expenses in the election district for the above Do council members, shall be 46,00,000 won; and

Nevertheless, around June 23, 2014, the Defendant reported as if the amount paid for election expenses was 42,031,516, while making an accounting report on the revenue and expenditure of political funds by the Jeju City Election Commission, but from March 23, 2014, the election expenses reported above were reported as if they were 42,031,516.

6. The sum of the Defendant’s allowances and actual expenses paid up to 12 times in total was omitted, and the amount actually paid as election expenses was KRW 50,131,516.

As a result, the Defendant spent election expenses exceeding 4,131,516 won, which is more than 46,000,000 won.

2. On June 23, 2014, the Defendant violated the Political Funds Act, while making an accounting report on the revenue and expenditure of political funds at the Election Commission at the Jeju election commission, on June 13, 2014, the Defendant stated the amount of KRW 600,00,000, which was received in June 13, 2014 from the national bank account (Account Number E), which is a political fund reporting account, as the actual expenses for accounting affairs, as the Defendant returned part of KRW 1,170,000, which was received on June 4, 2014, as the “candidate deposit” in the revenue column for political funds other than election expenses, and submitted it as evidence after making a copy of the “accounting statement” portion on the left side of the deposit passbook under the said D’s name as the deposit passbook and submitting it as the evidentiary materials.

As a result, the Defendant submitted a false copy of the revenue details of political funds and a copy of the deposit passbook while making an accounting report on the revenue and expenditure of political funds.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.