logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.11.06 2014고단6837
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 16, 2013, the Defendant is a person who was sentenced to one year of imprisonment or two years of suspended execution on August 24, 2013 by committing a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) in the Cheongju District Court Support on August 16, 2013.

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, around August 7, 2014, around 16:00, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs, which are psychotropic drugs obtained as a psychotropic substance, from a shuttle toilet at a bus terminal located in the window of Changwon-si, in a single-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-related-use-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-related-

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Written statement of the prosecutor’s office of defense counsel;

1. Photographs (the result of the examination of urine simple reagents, part of medication, etc.);

1. Investigation report (in cases of attaching photographs of the results of the examination of simple reagents, etc.);

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records and investigation reports (finding facts during the period of suspension of execution of sentence, and the application of statutes;

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. The decision is delivered with a comprehensive consideration of the sentencing factors that are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime during the grace period, even though he was sentenced to a suspended sentence for the reason of sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (100,000 won at the market price for one-time medication of a scoponphone), such as the fact that he committed the instant crime during the suspended period, and the fact that he was involved in a single medication.

arrow