Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in D Uidi A4.

On February 19, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on February 19, 2015, and continued the front road of Seoul Jung-gu E from the Jung-gu, Seoul to the Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul.

At this point, since it is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new code, but he neglected this duty and caused the driver's G 110E-obababa in the opposite direction of the driver's F (52 years old) driving under the direct margin signals, even though the driver's duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the complexity and complexity of the sleep, which requires approximately 11 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. F’s statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A report on traffic accidents and a report on actual condition;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have caused the instant traffic accident in violation of the signal and thereby causing serious injury to the victim. However, the defendant is recognized to have committed the instant traffic accident, but the defendant is remarkably divided and reflected in his criminal act, the defendant's vehicle has agreed with the victim, the vehicle is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, the circumstances after the crime, the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of the instant case, including the defendant's age, family relationship, etc., shall be determined as