logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.15 2014나32167
대여금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. According to the records, the court of first instance delivered a certified copy, etc. of the instant decision of performance recommendation to "Seoul Dobong-gu B Apartment 116 Dong 1206, 1206," which the Plaintiff entered in the complaint, but became unable to serve due to the Plaintiff's change of address. According to the Plaintiff's resident registration address correction, the Defendant sent a certified copy, etc. of the instant decision of performance recommendation to "Seoul Gangseo-gu C Apartment 602 Dong 1105," which is the Defendant's resident registration address at night, three times, but at around November 29, 2013, around 20:11, December 201, 2013, and around 15:05, the court of first instance ordered the Defendant to submit a certified copy of the instant decision to the Defendant by public notice on December 16, 2014, and then closed the first instance court's judgment within 2014.

Therefore, the appeal of this case is lawful.

2. Basic facts

A. D’s obligation on February 1, 2003 between a national credit card company, a credit card company, and a national credit card company (which was merged with a national bank, a corporation on October 1, 2003, and the Plaintiff comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations of the national bank, as a result of division from the national bank, on March 2, 2011; hereinafter both national credit card companies and national bank companies, a “Plaintiff”) and D’s obligation on credit card payments owed to the Plaintiff as follows.

arrow