logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고정124
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, C, and D are found in the house where the victim F is residing at around 16:30 on October 07, 2013, the defendant, C, and D are found to be in the house where the victim F is located at around 102, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City.

The victim shows that "the victim sees it, such as clothes, etc. to the defendant's daily behaviors, and is currently living in this situation.

D and the defendant jointly live with the victim's hand floor, prices the body of the victim's breath and the body of the body of the victim's breath in drinking, and continuously cut the body of the victim into a stairs, and then breaths the victim's body.

As a result, the Defendant jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as the mouth of inside and outside walls and internal walls that require treatment for a period of 42 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and C;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. The written diagnosis of injury (the defendant and his defense counsel reported that the defendant was satisfing with the victim at the time of the instant case by reporting that the defendant was satisfing with the victim at the time of the instant case, and there was no time to satisfing with the victim, and even if the victim was assaulted by domestic affairs, it constitutes a legitimate defense because it was intended to restrain the victim from satisfing the victim. However, in full view of the evidence, the defendant sufficiently recognized the fact that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim jointly with C and D, and the above act

Therefore, the above argument is without merit. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of a punishment);

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow