Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment of imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) of the court below is too unfasible, and the prosecutor is too unfased and unreasonable.

2. In order to establish the legal order of the judgment state and eradicate the light of the public authority, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties needs to be strictly punished; the defendant was indicted for violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.), and committed the crime of this case against police officers who wear a uniform without being aware of the fact that he was tried in the Suwon District Court, and the defendant was punished for violence-related crimes, and several times, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant. The defendant is led to the confession and rebuttal of the crime of this case; the defendant has no record of punishment for violence-related crimes since 2008; there is no record of punishment exceeding the suspension of execution; the defendant deposited KRW 50,000 in addition to the deposit of KRW 1 million in the court below for slope J.

In full view of the above-mentioned circumstances, including the accused’s age and happiness environment, the lower court’s punishment seems to be reasonable, and thus, the Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided