A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:40 on April 25, 2019, the Defendant filed several complaints to resolve malodor problems in the second floor livestock farming industry and the office located in the vicinity of his/her residence, on the ground that the Defendant did not accept the complaint on several occasions on the ground that he/she did not accept the second floor livestock farming industry and the office located in Namnam, and used it as assaulting a public official D, E, F, G, H, I, J, J, K, K, L, etc. who was in his/her duty to remove swine excreta and urine in an environmental livestock industry and office.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by public officials of the C military administration, and at the same time damaged goods used by public offices equivalent to the market value of KRW 10,727,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, I, J, G, E, H, L, and K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the occurrence of official duties, each investigation report, and each internal investigation report;

1. Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act ( point of damage to public goods) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The Defendant’s crime of abusing violence against a public official who performs legitimate official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act requires strict punishment in that the Defendant’s crime of abusing violence is light of public authority, and the responsibility for such crime is not less and less weak, and requires the awareness of the general public in society. The Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, damage to damaged public goods was recovered in entirety, and the victims did not want punishment against the Defendant, and the victims did not want such punishment in consultation with the victims, such as age, character, character, environment, health conditions, motive and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by the order, taking into account all of the sentencing factors specified in the arguments in the instant case such as the following circumstances.