logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.05.22 2012가합11659
대여금등
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 122,00,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its amount from November 21, 2012 to May 22, 2014.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the main claim

A. (1) On August 2005, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion entered into a lease agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant to lease approximately KRW 4 billion (300 million (hereinafter “the first lease agreement of this case”) on the premise that the lease deposit amount and the lease period of KRW 24 months (hereinafter “the lease agreement of this case”).

(30 million won was paid to the Defendant. On March 1, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant to rent approximately KRW 100 million as lease deposit and KRW 24 months as lease deposit (hereinafter “the second lease agreement”).

(1) Upon entering into the lease deposit and paying KRW 100 million (hereinafter “the lease deposit of this case”).

(2) On or before the end of August 2006, the Plaintiff completed the transfer of the above building, which is the object of the lease. However, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff part of the above lease deposit with the game machine equivalent to KRW 180 million, etc. on February 19, 2008; KRW 20 million on March 7, 2008; KRW 70 million on May 6, 2008; KRW 250 million on total; KRW 150 million on the remainder of the lease deposit; and KRW 30 million on May 6, 2008; and KRW 150 million on the remainder of the lease deposit with the Plaintiff. Accordingly, according to the fact that the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder of the lease deposit with KRW 150 million and KRW 150 million on the remainder of the lease deposit; KRW 31,240,000,000 and KRW 350,000 on the part of the Plaintiff’s financial transaction transaction transaction transaction information; and KRW 3414

A. The purport of the Plaintiff’s lease between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is that the Plaintiff, on June 25, 2005, set the lease deposit amount of KRW 300 million and the lease term of KRW 24 months on the one side of the above D shopping building owned by the Defendant.

arrow