Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Some of the facts charged were revised to the extent that it does not undermine the defendant's right of defense.

The Defendant, from November 14, 2013, was a person who established and operated Daegu Suwon-gu C Building and D Co., Ltd. (1509) from November 14, 2013, and placed an advertisement “tender on behalf of auction” in the place of auction information and living information, thereby allowing those who reported it to receive a successful bid of real estate.

No one, other than an attorney-at-law, shall handle or arrange any act of representation, legal counseling, preparation of legal documents, etc. with respect to legal cases, such as non-contentious cases, in return for promising to receive money or valuables.

On March 3, 2016, upon receipt of a request to request the bid price from E (or 71 years of age), the Defendant reported the bid for the auction on behalf of the above office, and received the request to request the bid price. On the other hand, the Defendant led all the auction process, such as requesting the Daegu District Court Branch Branch of the District Court to bid for the auction of real estate for G house and the auction goods, and determining the bid price after analyzing the auction goods, and then ordered E to obtain the bid price at around the 8th of the same month, and received a total of 3 million won as a fee.

As a result, the defendant was not a lawyer and represented for auction bidding.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of all certificates of each registered matter (D stock company), receipts, and copies of certificates of confirmation of transfer of deposits without passbooks;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense and subparagraph 1 of Article 109 of the Act (Selection of Penalty) by an attorney at the option of a punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. An attorney-at-law for additional collection;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion against the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (the grounds for conviction) asserts that the defendant not only did the defendant act on behalf of the defendant in the auction bidding, but only did the "consult" or "consult".

l.p. g., p.