logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.01.05 2014가단4315
임금 및 퇴직금 등
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 36,910,640 and KRW 11,285,154 among them, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 36,910,640, and KRW 681,486.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a juristic person whose purpose is to engage in civil engineering and construction work, etc., and the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant, from September 1, 2007 to March 20, 201 (hereinafter “the first period of employment”) and retired, and was re-employed, and served from April 14, 201 to December 18, 2013 (hereinafter “the second period of employment”).

B. A retirement allowance during the first period of service (hereinafter “the first retirement allowance”) is KRW 11,285,154, and a retirement allowance during the second period of service (hereinafter “the second retirement allowance”) is KRW 8,294,066.

C. When the Plaintiff uses the Plaintiff’s vehicle for the Defendant’s business during his/her term of office, the Plaintiff paid the Plaintiff’s expenses, such as oil expenses and expressway tolls, as the Plaintiff’s money, and submitted evidentiary materials to the Defendant

The sum paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff during the period of the first and second years of service is KRW 234,823,840 in total.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Gap evidence Nos. 12 through 19, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The parties’ assertion that the Plaintiff did not receive the instant retirement allowance from the Defendant, 681,486 of the instant retirement allowance, and 681,486 of the amount of June 2013’s benefits from July 1 to December 201 of the same year, and 248,796 of the annual and monthly leave allowance, and 374,798 of the year-end year-end settlement refund.

On the other hand, the defendant claimed that the monthly salary during the first service period was all paid by the defendant, and on May 2, 201, the plaintiff was paid KRW 15 million to the plaintiff as the first retirement allowance and salary of this case, the monthly unpaid allowance was included in the monthly salary, and since the annual paid leave was paid in lieu of the annual paid leave, there was no obligation to pay the monthly unpaid allowance, and the remaining salary during the second service period also exceeds KRW 2,792,410.

B. Determination Doesck;

arrow