Text
1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court on the cause of the claim is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion
A. The defendant's assertion that: (a) the plaintiff asserts that the necessary or beneficial expenses for the real estate of this case (i) electricity, fire-fighting, wire or broadcasting facilities, broadcasting facilities, 54,810,00 won, (ii) facilities, heating, fire-fighting, equipment, exchange wind, virtue facilities, (iii) the ceiling 9,135,00 won, (iv) the floor, 13,195,00 won, (v) the kitchen, 30,450,000 won, (vii), toilets, partitions, partitions, 70 won per household, 41,940,000 won, 3,200,000 won, 8,000 won, 8,000 won, 9,60,000, 9,60,000, 10,000 won, 40,00, 24,00, 24,00, 4,00-day, 2, 2, 4,0.
B. As to the part of the claim for reimbursement of the necessary or beneficial cost, the Defendant paid the necessary or beneficial cost equivalent to the above amount claimed by the Defendant solely on the basis of the descriptions or images of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 as to the health team, Eul’s evidence
It is insufficient to recognize that the increase in the value of the building or the increase in the value of the building exists, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, as well as the fact that the plaintiffs and the defendant agreed to the effect that "the lessee shall restore the building to its original state at the expense of the lessee at the time of returning the real estate, and at the time of concluding the lease contract of this case, the lessee shall not claim the equipment, fixtures, premiums and other beneficial expenses for the building installed by the business necessity of the lessee to the lessor (Article 6 of the lease contract)."