logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.02.20 2018구합68490
관리처분계획무효확인 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On October 25, 2006, the "LLAD Establishment Promotion Committee" (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Cooperative Establishment Promotion Committee") submitted a plan for designation and maintenance of the housing redevelopment improvement zone to the head of the Gu.

On January 23, 2008, the Seoul Metropolitan Government Joint Committee for Urban Construction (hereinafter referred to as the "Joint Committee") deliberated on the designation of an improvement zone and the formulation of an improvement plan with respect to the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M M M, and the N (P) made a decision on the following additional terms (hereinafter referred to as "instant terms and conditions") so that the same width can be maintained up to theO.

On February 18, 2008, the Defendant Cooperative Establishment Promotion Committee established and submitted to the head of the Si/Gun/Gu on the following measures: “In order to maintain N to the same width according to the results of deliberation (revision) including the instant condition of this case by the Joint Committee, all of the investigation of the intent to incorporate N to the improvement zone to P and Q owners of P and Q, and thus, it is deemed impossible to implement the plan to secure road width through the incorporation of the zone.” As such, the plan to take measures such as “the plan to actively support and cooperate when the Dongdaemun-gu project is

On April 10, 2008, the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City designated MJ as an improvement zone for “L-Housing Redevelopment Project” (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”); “R” as a starting point; “S” as an end point; “S” as an end point; and “S” as an urban planning facility (road); and “S” as an urban planning facility (road) with a width of 153 meters; and “S” as an urban planning facility (road) with a width of 15 meters; the above improvement plan included the condition of the instant case, which is subject to deliberation by the Joint Committee.

(The boundary of the rearrangement zone of this case, the detailed location of N, and the parcel necessary to extend N outside the rearrangement zone of this case, etc. The defendant head of the Gu authorized the establishment of the defendant association on September 4, 2008.

The head of the Gu shall make April 1, 2009.

arrow