1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Seoul Central District Court 2009Kahap46328 dated September 21, 2009

1. Basic facts

A. Mediation between the Plaintiff and D 1) Plaintiff (the original name was J, but the name was changed on April 14, 2010)

(1) In the case of a loan claim filed against D, Seoul Western District Court 2008Gahap4889, the Seoul Western District Court 2008Dahap4889, Nov. 14, 2008, the settlement in litigation was made on November 14, 2008. The key contents of the settlement clause are as follows: D’s building on the ground of officetels (hereinafter “the instant officetel”).

(2) The apartment of this case is located in the Gansi-si, Gansi-si, F apartment No. 509, 1603 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) On November 14, 2008, the Plaintiff’s registration procedure for the transfer of ownership was implemented on the ground of reconciliation on November 14, 2008. 2. At the same time, the Plaintiff did not perform the registration procedure for the transfer of ownership on the instant officetel as stated in paragraph (1) with the Suwon District Court, Dongcheon District Court, Dongcheon District Court, 483 through 4950 [the total amount of KRW 1.29 billion,29,99,000,000,000,000,000,000 won (the total amount of debt 1.6 billion,000,000,000,000,000 won (the total amount of debt 2,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000 won (the aggregate amount of debt 2,000,0000,000 won) on the instant apartment as stated in paragraph (1).