logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2014.07.09 2013고단701 (1)
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 701] Around 19:10 on June 12, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at “D cafeteria” located in Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, the Defendant left the part of the victim E (the age of 52) without any particular reason; the victim avoided it; the victim wn the inside part of the victim by drinking; the victim wnd the part of the victim by drinking, and the shape of the “V” was set up as the stop and stop of the bad finger, and caused the victim’s safety equipment once to put about two weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

[2013Kadan794] On March 9, 2011, the Defendant told the victim at the office of the victim G located in Boan-si, Boan-si to the effect that “The victim would supply the victim with the security deposit for 20 million won and return the above money upon the completion of the supply of the third party.”

However, the defendant was planned to use the above money for personal purposes by the victim, and there was no particular revenue or property at the time, and there was no intention or ability to return the above money even if he received the money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained the total amount of KRW 19 million from the victim’s bank account (Account Number: H) to the victim’s name on March 9, 201, KRW 10 million on April 14, 201, and KRW 7 million on May 3, 201.

[2013 Highest 1002] Around January 14, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim K, “The Republic of Korea may supply 30 tons of high-quality sea water to him/her. It is so known that it would change the deposit amount of KRW 20 million because it has a culture in the solar.”

However, the fact was that the defendant did not know about the collection business operator of the sea culture, even if he received money from the victim, he was planned to use it for his personal purpose, and there was no intention or ability to supply the sea ginseng to the victim.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow