The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. The Defendant injured by negligence is a person who raises one mag in front of his house (variety: Dog, 1 year, 44 g) at the time of three or more times.

On April 13, 2019, at around 16:34, when the Defendant employed the seal and made the dog, the Defendant reported the above dog’s name and continuously moved the dog to the parking lot of the chille.

Since the vicinity of the Cjra parking lot is a place that is not a village resident, the defendant, who raises a large amount of horse, has a duty of care to take measures to prevent the attack of the dog by using locking devices so that the hacker connecting the hacks and hacks can not be cut off.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, with the negligence that did not properly dyppppphers, unfolded a dog to the victim D (Woo, 73 years old) who passed the hyphere while leaving the hyp, and caused the victim to have the right blue of the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s negligence, such as the shoulder and neck’s damage, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

(b) No person who violates the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection shall make any codes, text, sound, image, or motion picture that arouses fear or apprehensions through information and communications networks to reach another person repeatedly;

Nevertheless, at around 19:11 on May 13, 2019, the Defendant called the victim F with his cell phone (E) and sent the victim F with an voice message “I am satisfy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fy fys at the court.”

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the injury caused by negligence is subject to Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act.