The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable because of the summary of the reasons for appeal.

2. Determination takes into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided and reflected; (b) the age of 20 is still 20 years; and (c) there is no record of criminal punishment other than that sentenced once a fine is imposed; (b) these points appears to have been taken into account in the lower court; (c) in light of the circumstances and details of each of the crimes in this case, the nature of the crimes in question is very poor; (d) the victims and their parents appear to have suffered considerable mental pain; (e) the Defendant did not make efforts to recover damage; and (e) other conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, criminal motive, method of crime, and the circumstances after the crime, are considered, and thus, it cannot be deemed unfair for the lower court to impose punishment too much

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.