logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.04.26 2017가합12623
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. It is confirmed that each insurance contract listed in the separate sheet No. 1 signed by the Plaintiff and Defendant A is null and void.

2. The defendant B.

Reasons

1. Basic facts [based on recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence 1 through 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 through 14 (including provisional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply);

(ii) the entry in Category B(5) and the purport of the entire pleading

A. On December 30, 2010, the Plaintiff and the insured as Defendant B entered into an insurance contract listed in attached Table 1(1) (hereinafter “Class 1 insurance contract”) and the insurance contract listed in attached Table 1(2) (hereinafter “Class 2 insurance contract”) on February 14, 201, respectively.

B. From May 6, 2011 to May 21, 2011, Defendant B was hospitalized for 246 days due to the 15th anniversary of the commencement of the hospitalized Hospital’s “infection and tension of the bones,” etc. by “infection and tension of the bones,” etc., as shown in Table 1, Defendant B received hospitalized treatment for 16 days from May 6, 201 to September 20, 201.

Serial 1: 201-05-06 201-201-216 201-216 Manyang C Hospital, 2011-06-10 201-28 Manyang C Hospital, 2011-09-222 201-10 201-106 201-10 15 4 other 01, 201-201-10-106 201- 207 201-14 201-10 06 201-14 20, 201-14 201-14 206 - 201- 7 Man-6 16 - 20 Man-6 Man-16 - 20 Man-6 Man-16 - 3 Man-200 Man-14.

arrow