The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant C shall be reversed.

Defendant

C A person shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Defendant

A, B-.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The court below acquitted Defendant C on this part on the basis of the statement in the AB court's judgment without any justifiable reason even though the statement made by the prosecutor (the part where Defendant C was the head of the AB investigation agency of the victim with the camping net) is relatively consistent and specific. The court below acquitted Defendant C on this part without any justifiable reason. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the Defendants (two years of imprisonment for the Defendants A, two years of imprisonment for the Defendants B and one year of imprisonment for the Defendants C and one year of imprisonment for the Defendants C) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On December 24, 2012, at around 02:00 on December 24, 2012, Defendant C, in collusion with Defendant A, etc., placed the victim’s head one time from the driver’s seat in the vehicle of the victim AB parked in the playter near the Z located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

⑵ 판단 ㈎ 원심의 판단 위 공소사실에 부합하는 증거로는 Z, AB의 수사기관 및 이 법정에서의 일부 진술이 있으나, Z은 최종적으로 야구방망이는 피고인 B이 들고 있었을 뿐 피고인 C은 야구방망이를 들고 있지 않았다고 진술하고 있고, AB은 수사기관에서는 피고인 C이 야구방망이로 자신의 머리를 1회 내리찍었다고 진술하다가 이 법원에서는 정확히 누가 야구방망이로 때렸는지 모르겠다고 진술을 번복하고 있는바, 위 공소사실에 부합하는 Z, AB의 일부 진술은 믿지 아니하고, 그 외 검사가 제출한 증거들만으로는 위 공소사실을 인정하기에 부족하고, 달리 증거가 없다는 이유로 이 부분 공소사실을 무죄로 판단하였다.

㈏ 당심의 판단 그러나 위와 같은 원심의 판단은 선뜻 수긍하기 어렵다.

The following circumstances can be acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the lower court.