logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.04.07 2015가단109074
유치권부존재
Text

1. It is confirmed that the defendants' lien does not exist with respect to real estate stated in the attached list.

2...

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On June 2, 2015, the Plaintiff purchased the instant real estate and acquired ownership in a compulsory auction procedure for the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. In the above compulsory auction procedure, the Defendant asserted the right of retention on the instant real estate and reported the right of retention.

C. A claim asserted by the Defendants does not exist in relation to the instant real estate and the possession of the instant real estate does not exist, and there is no right of retention of the Defendants concerning the instant real estate.

2. Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment made by a deemed as a foreigner);

arrow