logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.25 2018고정163
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged: (a) around 07:00 on June 5, 2017, the Defendant engaged in a similar behavior by promptly giving the said D’s sexual organ as well as making the said D’s sexual organ as soon as possible, in a 102 room located on the B branch office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) serving as female employees at the above main office as a female employee; and (c) receiving KRW 30,00 from D who served as a guest at that

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the conviction must be based on evidence of probative value, which makes it possible for a judge to have the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt.

Therefore, if there is no such evidence, there is a doubt that the defendant is guilty.

The interest of the defendant is to be determined by the interests of the defendant.

A statement which contains D's statement, the police and the protocol prepared by the prosecutor's office, which corresponds directly to the fact that the defendant committed an act of interference with D's sexual organ as soon as possible by entering the court after receiving KRW 30,00 won from D, shall be admissible as evidence, unless D's petition is acknowledged by the original person D, unless D's petition is admitted as evidence by the original person D, and further, D's 12 report processing table and D's summary order which reported the defendant's office's office to interfere with the defendant's business with the defendant's sexual organ, are an inquiry into the punishment for which a fine for summary order was paid, but under the following circumstances, there was a dispute with E, the head of the office for the extension of 112 service hours before D's appearance, ② D has received a demand from an investigative agency for attendance at the court, ③ D's summons for a fine not exceeding 30,000 won, ④ has been summoned as a witness by the court's witness, and ④ has been summoned by the witness during the above 400.

arrow