logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.10 2013고합162
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복범죄등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 4, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim at around 23:30, on the ground that the victim in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C was “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D (Nam, 55 years of age), but the victim was aware of his knowledge, on the ground that the victim was not aware of “her drinking alcohol” and “the victim was not aware of her drinking alcohol.” However, the Defendant assaulted the victim at around 10 times by drinking the victim’s clothes and breasts of the victim.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

A. On February 6, 2013, the Defendant reported the occurrence of the assault by the victim to the above paragraph (1) on February 5, 2013, and was investigated by the Seoul Guro Police Station on February 5, 2013, and threatened the victim with respect to its character. On February 6, 2013, the Defendant found the victim at the Ecafeteria under the above paragraph (1) and requested the victim to make a written agreement, but was rejected, the Defendant was the victim’s refusal to do so. The Defendant threatened the victim that “I would have caused the governance me, I will not be able to do so, I will see that I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, and you will see that I will see it, and you will see it.”

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim with the purpose of retaliation against the victim's criminal report and the statement of damage in relation to his criminal case investigation.

B. On February 7, 2013, the Defendant found at around 19:00 on February 7, 2013, and demanded the victim to prepare and deliver a written agreement, but was rejected. On the same day, at around 23:00, the Defendant again found the victim as the “Ecafeteria” and used the victim’s face at around 23:0 on the same day, and used the victim’s body or body. “I see this dog, she is allowed to report NA, she is allowed to report NA, anywhere, and we see. I see by means of a written agreement. I see as follows: “I am the victim’s body or body. I am the victim’s body or body.”

arrow