The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the summary of the grounds for appeal by the victim E (hereinafter “victim”), it is recognized that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by drinking the victim as stated in the instant facts charged.

However, the court below acquitted the charged facts of this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime.

Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) around 14:05 on January 24, 2013, the Defendant suffered KRW 1,300,000 from the victim to receive the balance of 1,300,000 won for vehicle sales from the victim, and (b) took the victim’s bath to the victim, and was injured by the Defendant, such as a scarb, with the right-hand bed and the right-hand bed for two weeks of the transition.

B. (1) As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements from the investigative agency of the victim and the court of the original trial, and written diagnosis of injury to the victim.

She, however, it is difficult to believe each of the statements made by the victim in the following respects:

㈎ 기록에 의하면, 피해자는, ① 2013. 1. 24. 경찰에서 진술할 당시에는 ‘피고인이 주먹으로 옆구리를 때리고 오른쪽 어깨를 한 대 때려서 바닥에 쓰러지면서 점퍼가 찢어졌다. 피고인이 앞머리를 2회 가격하고 뒤에서 머리로 뒷머리를 3회 들이받았다.’라는 취지로 진술하였으나, ② 2013. 7. 11. 원심법정에 증인으로 출석하여서는 ‘피고인이 오른쪽 어깨를 주먹으로 2~3회 때려서 깜짝 놀라서 팍 쓰러졌다가 일어났고, 그 외에는 더 맞은 사실이 없다. 얼굴은 맞은 적이 없고, 뒷머리는 살짝 비켜가서 맞지 않았다.’라는 취지로 진술하고 있어, 피해자의 각 진술은 일관성이 없다.

㈏ 피해자가 찢어졌다고 주장하는 점퍼가 증거로 제출된 사실이 없다.

㈐...