The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below seems to have recognized all of the crimes of this case, and it appears that the traffic accident of this case occurred because the defendant was committed with gross negligence in violation of the signal at the investigation stage and at the court below, the victims and his family members agreed smoothly with all of the victims and the defendant's family members. The victims and the defendant wanted to leave four times the criminal records of this case, three times the criminal records of the defendant were committed in the same kind, but the economic situation of the defendant is not good, and the defendant's health is not good. However, since the accident of this case occurred at the time of the accident of this case, the defendant, who was engaged in the bus operation duty, should have been driven carefully in accordance with the new subparagraph, reducing the speed and taking into account the surrounding circumstances, and since the accident of this case was committed with the gross negligence in violation of the signal, the traffic accident of this case was committed by one person, two persons died, six persons, and the situation of the accident of this case was extremely favorable to the defendant, the circumstances and the circumstances of this case's new sentencing after considering the circumstances or circumstances of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.