logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.11.29 2012고단3535
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant pays 159,00,000 won to the applicant for compensation.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 8, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended sentence for a crime of false accusation at the Sung-nam Branch of Suwon District Court on October 8, 201 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 28, 201.

On May 201, the Defendant told the victim at the G attorney-at-law office of the victim G (the age of 39) in Seocho-gu Seoul (the age of Ha) in Seocho-gu (the age of 39) of the Seocho-gu, that the victim “on the face of leaving the scambling world, some of the scambling seasons are exchanged or repaired, and some of them are exchanged with other things,

However, at the time, the Defendant had a debt amounting to KRW 449,90,000 for the Defendant, and due to the above debt relationship, the Defendant sold the name cards that the Defendant had operated with his her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she had no other her her her her her her her her her her she

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) around that time, he received each market value equivalent to 35 million won per each market value of the Roddrid de de fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen fluen flu

In addition, on May 201, 201, the Defendant received the delivery of an amount equivalent to 4 million won at each market price of her clock belt under the pretext of being sold in exchange for other products from the victim at the office of the victim in the middle of 2011, which was three days after the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant's 150 million won in total from the victim's six visual prices.

arrow